Two Different Approaches to Faith

In studying the effect that Martin Luther and John Calvin had on John Wesley's doctrine of Perfect Love (sanctification) , I discovered a reason why some denominations are predisposed to be lienient or firm on the dispute over homosexuality.
Martin Luther's view of faith is based in the human factor , the person's mind ,conscience and will.
He was more concerned about having a clear conscience before God.
His thinking emphasized the act of believing.
How a man believes.
John Calvin's view of faith is based on the divine part of faith, the divine truths, the realities that are the substance of faith.
He was more concerned about what is believed.
His thinking empasized what to believe in.
What a man believes.
Lutheran faith is based on a clear conscience and the act of believing.
Calvinistic faith is based on scripture and what is believed in.
As a result the Lutheran views the Bible as a good ,profitable, and important book but not a necessary, infallable book.
Only necessary until you discover experientially the truth of justification by faith.
Experience is most important. Knowing you are saved through faith in Jesus Christ.
Calvinist's view the Bible as the Word of God, indespensable, infallible, the bread of life.
If this difference in views of the Bible still holds true , then this would explain why Lutheran and Presbyterian churches feel it is more compassionate to accept homosexuality. They feel it is acceptable to interpret the Bible liberally.
Calvinistic and Holiness churches view the Bible as inspired, inerrant, infallable; so they believe it is more loving to call homosexuality a sin. To do any less is to compromise the Word of God.
Nature sides with the view that homosexuality is sin. Otherwise reproduction and disease point in the wrong direction.